Please note that this list may not be complete as we only add upcoming seminars once we have sufficient details from the presenter.
Current research suggests that there are knowledge gaps in institutional practices towards lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer/questioning (LGBTQ) cancer patients, and that the LGBTQ+ community represent a 'growing and medically underserved population' (Quinn et al. 2015). In the context of cancer care, quantitative evidence shows that there are disparities in cancer outcomes between LGBTQ+ cancer patients and their 'heterosexual and cisgender counterparts' (Kamen et al. 2019), but there is a lack of qualitative research to address where services are lacking from the perspective of an LGBTQ+ service user.
This research demonstrates how the age of the internet can be utilised to provide an insight into underserved populations, and to gain empirical evidence and honest accounts from service users who might experience a fear of stigma or mistreatment in offline settings. The research explores the practical application of NLP and presents a methodology that encompasses web scraping, corpus creation, data annotation and anonymisation, a hybrid system for emotion detection utilising the NRC emotion intensity lexicon (Mohammad 2017) with machine learning methods, and topic modelling using Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA). The results of the research demonstrate an emotion detection classifier with a micro F1 score of 65%, and 8 clusters of topics that emerge from the topic modelling task. These topics provide insights that provoke further discussion, particularly within the theme of Diagnosis, Treatment and Sexuality, where excerpts describe that 'LGBT people with cancer can face discrimination and disqualification', and 'healthcare resources are all based on heteronormative assumptions'.
References
Kamen, C.S., Alpert, A., Margolies, L., Griggs, J.J., Darbes, L., Smith-Stoner, M., Lytle, M., Poteat, T., Scout, N.F.N. and Norton, S.A. (2019). "Treat us with dignity": a qualitative study of the experiences and recommendations of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) patients with cancer. Supportive Care in Cancer, 27(7), 2525-2532.
Mohammad, S. M. (2017). Word affect intensities. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.08798.
Quinn, G.P., Sanchez, J.A., Sutton, S.K., Vadaparampil, S.T., Nguyen, G.T., Green, B.L., Kanetsky, P.A. and Schabath, M.B. (2015). Cancer and lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender/transsexual, and queer/questioning (LGBTQ) populations. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians, 65(5), 384-400.
Online romance scams are a prevalent form of mass-marketing fraud in the West. In this type of scam, fraudsters craft fake profiles and manually interact with their victims. Due to the characteristics of this type of fraud, and the peculiarities of how dating sites operate, traditional detection methods (e.g., those used in spam filtering) are ineffective.
This talk will report on our investigation into the archetype of online dating profiles used in this form of fraud, including their use of demographics, profile descriptions, and images, shedding light on both the strategies deployed by scammers to appeal to victims and the implicit traits of victims themselves. Our work is presented in the context of building and evaluating a machine-learning classifier for detecting spam profiles, and elaborates on our findings from investigating areas of under-performance.
joint talk with the SCC DSG group